Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling grain shipments to detect genetically modified seed.

T B Whitaker1, L Freese, F G Giesbrecht

  • 1USDA/ARS, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7625, USA. Tom_Whitaker@ncsu.edu

Journal of AOAC International
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Risk Assessment Model for Importation of United States Milling Wheat Containing Tilletia contraversa.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Behavioral effects of endogenous or exogenous estradiol and progesterone on cocaine sensitization in female rats.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2014
Same author

GABA system changes in methylphenidate sensitized female rats.

Behavioural brain research·2012
Same author

Determination of aflatoxin risk components for in-shell Brazil nuts.

Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment·2011
Same author

Sampling foods for mycotoxins.

Food additives and contaminants·2006
Same author

Design of a sampling plan to detect ochratoxin A in green coffee.

Food additives and contaminants·2006
Same journal

Single-Laboratory Validation of Simultaneous Determination of Aflatoxins in Nutraceuticals following immune-affinity Column Cleanup and Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
Same journal

Determination of Bromoform in Seaweed, Oil, and Animal Feed by GC-MS/MS: AOAC Official Method 2026.01, First Action.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
Same journal

ICRF-Assisted Box-Behnken Design and Optimization for Rapid UPLC-PDA Determination of Dorzolamide Hydrochloride and Timolol Maleate in an Ophthalmic Preparation.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
Same journal

Advancing PFAS Analysis Through Scientific Publication.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
Same journal

A Green UPLC-UV Method for L-Ascorbic Acid Determination Based on a Biodegradable Chelating Agent and Synergistic Hydrophobic-Electrostatic Interactions.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
Same journal

Quantification of 24 Inorganic Impurities in Vismodegib and Idelalisib Anti-Cancer Drug Substances by Using ICP-MS.

Journal of AOAC International·2026
See all related articles

Increasing sample size for genetically modified (GM) seed testing reduces variability and risk. Larger samples of biotech seed testing lower both buyer and seller risks when evaluating lots.

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Biotechnology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Genetically modified (GM) or biotech seeds are increasingly common in agriculture.
  • Accurate detection and quantification of GM seeds in commercial lots are crucial for regulatory compliance and trade.
  • Sampling methods significantly impact the reliability of test results for GM seed presence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of sample size on the variability of test results for GM seed detection.
  • To assess how sample size and accept/reject limits influence buyer's and seller's risks in GM seed lot evaluation.
  • To provide insights for optimizing sampling strategies in biotech seed analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the binomial distribution to model the sampling process.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated the coefficient of variation (cv) for sample test results at different sample sizes (500 and 1000 seeds).
  • Assessed buyer's risk (probability of accepting non-compliant lots) and seller's risk (probability of rejecting compliant lots) under a 1.0% GM seed tolerance.

    • Main Results:

    • A 1.0% GM seed lot showed a coefficient of variation of 44.5% with 500-seed samples.
    • Increasing sample size to 1000 seeds reduced the cv to 31.5%.
    • Larger sample sizes consistently decreased both buyer's and seller's risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Increasing sample size in GM seed testing significantly reduces result variability and associated risks.
    • Accept/reject limits interact with sample size to modulate buyer's and seller's risks.
    • Optimizing sample size is essential for accurate and fair evaluation of GM seed lots.