Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Anticipatory control of vertical lifting force and momentum during the squat lift with expected and unexpected loads
D G Heiss1, R K Shields, H J Yack
1Physical Therapy Division, School of Allied Medical Professions, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1234, USA. heiss.8@osu.edu
Study Design:
Mixed, repeated measures design.
Objectives:
To determine if previous experience with loads of similar weight influences the anticipatory lifting force and postural adjustments during the squat lift. To examine a multijoint, functional task for coordination between stability and movement. To determine if lifting unexpected loads results in trunk loading patterns associated with greater injury risk.
Background:
Workers are increasingly exposed to variability in materials handling thereby increasing the risk of injury. Understanding the control processes underlying lifting will support clinical decision making for preparing injured workers to return to realistic working conditions.
Methods And Measures:
Subjects (19 men, 4 women; mean age, 25.4 +/- 3.5 y) lifted a series of boxes weighing 5%, 20%, and 35% of their maximal lifting capacity. The loads were delivered via a gravity conveyor. The identical-appearing loads were ordered so that the subjects lifted several loads of similar weight, immediately followed by a lighter or heavier than expected load based on the previous lift.
Results:
Generally, the vertical lifting force, force rate, horizontal momentum, and angular momentum increased with an increase in expected load. Higher peak lumbar extensor moments occurred with lighter than expected loads (expected 20% and lifted 5% load = 238.2 +/- 91.2 N-m; expected 35% and lifted 5% load = 278.2 +/- 101.8 N-m) compared to expected loads of similar weight (expected and lifted 5% load = 205.0 +/- 73.2 N-m). Heavier than expected loads led to eccentric trunk movements when there were large mismatches between the expected and actual loads.
Conclusions:
The vertical lifting forces and whole body momentum were predictively scaled according to the expected load. The loading phase relationships indicated coordination between the lifting force, force rate, horizontal momentum, and angular momentum. Trunk loading during the lifts with unexpected loads showed patterns associated with increased injury risk.
More Related Videos
07:19A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Machines: Problem Solving II
Upward Impending Motion
To better comprehend how a screw jack functions, consider the completely unraveled thread as a block in contact with the...
Apparent Weight
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
Stability of structures
Eccentric Loading