Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critical care research and informed consent.

R S Saver1

  • 1McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, D.C.

North Carolina Law Review
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proposed safe harbor regulations clarify a few issues, leave others unresolved.

HealthSpan·1994
Same author

Reimbursing new technologies: why are the courts judging experimental medicine?

Stanford law review·1992
Same journal

LEGAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF CRISPR APPLICATIONS IN PSYCHIATRY.

North Carolina law review·2019
Same journal

University Software Ownership and Litigation: A First Examination.

North Carolina law review·2013
Same journal

Genetic disability: a modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination.

North Carolina law review·2006
Same journal

Patients' bill of rights: legislative cure-all or prescription for disaster?

North Carolina law review·2005
Same journal

Hospital ethics committees as the forum of last resort: an idea whose time has not come.

North Carolina law review·2003
Same journal

Arising from the dead: challenges of posthumous procreation.

North Carolina law review·1997
See all related articles

Informed consent rules hinder critical care research. Proposed FDA reforms are insufficient, necessitating broader changes to ethically advance patient treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research ethics
  • Clinical trial regulations
  • Emergency medicine

Background:

  • The doctrine of informed consent presents significant barriers to medical research, particularly in critical care settings.
  • Developing and evaluating new treatments for conditions like heart attacks and strokes is hampered by current informed consent requirements.
  • Existing regulations may inadvertently slow down the advancement of life-saving investigational technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the deficiencies of the current informed consent doctrine in critical care research.
  • To analyze the adequacy of proposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reforms aimed at facilitating critical care research.
  • To propose alternative and complementary reforms that balance patient safety with research progress.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review and analysis of the current informed consent doctrine as applied to critical care research.
  • Examination of proposed FDA reforms and their potential impact on research.
  • Development of a framework for alternative reforms considering all stakeholders.

Main Results:

  • Current informed consent doctrine poses substantial limitations on critical care research.
  • Proposed FDA reforms partially address existing deficiencies but lack comprehensive scope.
  • Existing regulations and proposed reforms do not fully accommodate the needs of patients, researchers, and the public.

Conclusions:

  • Broader and more nuanced reforms are required to ethically and effectively advance critical care research.
  • Alternative approaches to informed consent are necessary to foster innovation while protecting patient interests.
  • A balanced approach is crucial for the progress of medical research and patient outcomes in critical care.