Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hand-assisted vs. retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.

R A Batler1, S C Campbell, J T Funk

  • 1Department of Urology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Journal of Endourology
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New Model of Integrated Care for Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.

International journal of integrated care·2025
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2022
Same author

Computer-Generated R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scores Yield Comparable Predictive Results to Those of Human-Expert Scores in Predicting Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes.

The Journal of urology·2021
Same author

Dataset for evaluating WRF-Chem sensitivity to biogenic emission inventories in a tropical region. Global online model (MEGAN) vs local offline model (BIGA).

Data in brief·2021
Same author

Host genotype and exercise exhibit species-level selection for members of the gut bacterial communities in the mouse digestive system.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Re: Almassi et al.: Use of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Sestamibi Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography / X-ray Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Hybrid Oncocytic / Chromophobe Tumor in a Pediatric Patient. (Urology 2018;113:206-208).

Urology·2018
Same journal

Is Nonpapillary Puncture a Feasible Alternative to Papillary Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Procedure, Safety, and Outcomes of Patient-Controlled Sedation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Hyperplasia: A Preoperative Nomogram and a Postoperative Surveillance Protocol.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Bubble Trouble: The Thermal Risk of Ureteral Laser Lithotripsy in an Air Bubble.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 Complications after Unilateral Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in UPJO: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Appendiceal Onlay Ureteroplasty and Appendiceal Interposition Ureteroplasty for Complex Proximal Ureteral Strictures in Children: Insights Gained from Long-Term Follow-Up.

Journal of endourology·2026
See all related articles

Hand-assisted and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy show no significant differences in key outcomes like operative time, blood loss, or recovery. Further randomized trials are underway to confirm these findings in minimally invasive kidney surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy offers advantages over open procedures.
  • Hand-assisted and retroperitoneal approaches are two minimally invasive techniques for kidney removal.
  • Comparing these techniques is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the initial experiences with hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (RLN).
  • To identify significant differences in operative outcomes between HALN and RLN.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective comparison of 24 laparoscopic nephrectomies (12 HALN, 12 RLN).
  • Focus on radical nephrectomies for suspected stage T1 neoplasms with intact specimen extraction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of operative criteria, including learning curves, and postoperative recovery metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were observed in operative time, estimated blood loss, narcotic use, time to oral intake, or hospital stay between HALN and RLN.
    • Tumor volume was larger in the HALN group, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06).
    • No significant learning curve effects were detected within either surgical group.

    Conclusions:

    • Initial experience suggests HALN and RLN are comparable in terms of short-term postoperative outcomes.
    • Key metrics including operative time, blood loss, and recovery indicators show no significant divergence.
    • A prospective randomized trial is ongoing to further validate these findings.