Comparison of distortion and separation utilizing profile and Pow-R nickel-titanium rotary files

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the frequency of file distortion and separation between nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) ProFile 0.04 ISO taper rotary files and Ni-Ti Pow-R 0.04 ISO taper rotary files. For this study, 60 mesial root canals in 30 human mandibular first molars were chosen with the curvature angle of the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of the same tooth within five degrees. ProFile and Pow-R files were randomly assigned to either the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual canal of the same tooth. Instrumentation proceeded per the manufacturer's recommendations, in a crown-down technique, using Gates Glidden burs and rotary files in sizes #50 to #20. Positive and negative controls were used. The instruments were evaluated for signs of distortion or separation by three independent evaluators using magnification under microscope. A total of 420 files were evaluated, 210 files for Pow-R and 210 files for ProFile. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of instrument distortion or separation between the two file systems that were studied.