Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between circumflex artery motion and mitral annulus motion.

K Emilsson1, A Kähäri, B Wandt

  • 1Department of Clinical Physiology, Orebro Medical Centre Hospital, Sweden.

Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal : SCJ
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic nicotine effects on left ventricular function in healthy middle-aged people: an echocardiographic study.

Clinical physiology and functional imaging·2013
Same author

Acute effects on the ventricular function in Swedish snuffers: an echocardiographic study.

Clinical physiology and functional imaging·2012
Same author

Left and right ventricular systolic long-axis function and diastolic function in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Clinical physiology and functional imaging·2010
Same author

Echocardiographic measurements of the right ventricle: right ventricular outflow tract 1.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2010
Same author

Ensembl Genomes: extending Ensembl across the taxonomic space.

Nucleic acids research·2009
Same author

Tricuspid annulus motion and mitral annulus motion: Anatomical intimacy causing a good correlation?

Experimental and clinical cardiology·2009
Same journal

Critical Reflections on the ESCAPER Study: Addressing Inconsistencies and Methodological Challenges in Exploring Cardiovascular Resilience.

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
Same journal

A novel risk score based on exercise capacity to predict prognosis in adults with congenital heart disease.

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
Same journal

Completeness and interrater reliability of the Norwegian National Electrophysiology and Ablation Registry (AblaNor).

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
Same journal

Body size in young adulthood is associated with thoracic aortic events later in life.

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
Same journal

Outcome after cardiac surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses.

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
Same journal

Management of acute type A aortic dissection in the Nordic countries.

Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ·2026
See all related articles

Circumflex artery motion (CXM) differs from mitral annulus motion (MAM), especially in patients with normal ejection fraction. CXM reflects epicardial movement, while MAM reflects endocardial movement, impacting left ventricular systolic function assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiac Mechanics

Background:

  • Mitral annulus motion (MAM) and circumflex artery motion (CXM) are distinct measures of cardiac movement.
  • Understanding their differences is crucial for accurate assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare MAM with CXM at the basal lateral atrioventricular plane.
  • To differentiate motion amplitudes at endocardial (MAM) versus epicardial (CXM) sites.

Main Methods:

  • Echocardiography and coronary angiography were used to obtain MAM and CXM in 28 patients.
  • Motion amplitudes were recorded epicardially and endocardially in patients with normal and decreased ejection fraction (EF).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • CXM exceeded MAM in patients with normal EF, but was lower in those with decreased EF.
  • Epicardial motion amplitude was significantly higher than endocardial motion in normal EF patients.
  • No significant difference in motion amplitude was observed between epicardial and endocardial sites in decreased EF patients.

Conclusions:

  • CXM represents epicardial atrioventricular plane motion, distinct from endocardial MAM.
  • This distinction is critical when utilizing CXM for evaluating left ventricular systolic function.