Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Comparison between circumflex artery motion and mitral annulus motion
K Emilsson1, A Kähäri, B Wandt
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Orebro Medical Centre Hospital, Sweden.
Insights
Circumflex artery motion (CXM) differs from mitral annulus motion (MAM), especially in patients with normal ejection fraction. CXM reflects epicardial movement, while MAM reflects endocardial movement, impacting left ventricular systolic function assessments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Mechanics
Background:
- Mitral annulus motion (MAM) and circumflex artery motion (CXM) are distinct measures of cardiac movement.
- Understanding their differences is crucial for accurate assessment of left ventricular systolic function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare MAM with CXM at the basal lateral atrioventricular plane.
- To differentiate motion amplitudes at endocardial (MAM) versus epicardial (CXM) sites.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography and coronary angiography were used to obtain MAM and CXM in 28 patients.
- Motion amplitudes were recorded epicardially and endocardially in patients with normal and decreased ejection fraction (EF).
Main Results:
- CXM exceeded MAM in patients with normal EF, but was lower in those with decreased EF.
- Epicardial motion amplitude was significantly higher than endocardial motion in normal EF patients.
- No significant difference in motion amplitude was observed between epicardial and endocardial sites in decreased EF patients.
Conclusions:
- CXM represents epicardial atrioventricular plane motion, distinct from endocardial MAM.
- This distinction is critical when utilizing CXM for evaluating left ventricular systolic function.
Objective:
To compare mitral annulus motion (MAM) with circumflex artery motion (CXM) and the motion amplitude at an endocardial site (representing MAM) with an epicardial site (representing CXM) at the most basal lateral part of the atrioventricular plane (AVP).
Design:
MAM and CXM were obtained in 28 patients examined by echocardiography and coronary angiography. The motion amplitude epicardially and endocardially was recorded by echocardiography in 13 patients with normal ejection fraction (EF) (> or = 0.50) and in 13 patients with decreased EF (<0.50).
Results:
CXM was higher than MAM in most patients with normal EF but lower than MAM in most patients with decreased EF. The motion amplitude epicardially was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than endocardially in patients with normal EF. while there was no significant difference in patients with decreased EF.
Conclusion:
CXM represents the motion of the epicardial part of the AVP and differs from MAM, which represents the endocardial part of the wall. This must be considered when CXM is used for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

