Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Symptom validity testing: a critical review.

K J Bianchini1, C W Mathias, K W Greve

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.

The Clinical Neuropsychologist
|January 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The externalizing and internalizing pathways to marijuana use initiation: Examining the synergistic effects of impulsiveness and sensation seeking.

Developmental psychology·2021
Same author

The Development of Externalizing and Internalizing Behaviors Among Youth With or Without a Family History of Substance Use Disorder: The Indirect Effects of Early-Life Stress and Impulsivity.

Child psychiatry and human development·2020
Same author

Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2015
Same author

Disruption of facial affect processing in word deafness.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2004
Same author

Developmental changes in California Card Sorting Test performance.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in stroke rehabilitation: factor structure and relationship to outcome.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same journal

Unraveling delusional misidentification: A neuropsychological and experimental exploration of a new case of reduplication syndrome.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Characteristics and clinical correlates of objective medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Concordance between domain-based neuropsychological profiles and clinical phenotypes in young-onset dementia.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Exploring the relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of impulsivity.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Correction.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

TASIT super short: Empirical development of a social cognition screener.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
See all related articles

This review examines symptom validity tests (SVTs) used in forensic and clinical settings. It highlights methodological weaknesses in SVT research, offering recommendations for improving the admissibility of evidence derived from these tests.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • Symptom validity tests (SVTs) are crucial in assessing the credibility of self-reported symptoms, particularly in medico-legal contexts.
  • Malingering, the intentional simulation of symptoms for external gain, presents a significant challenge in clinical and forensic evaluations.
  • The use of SVTs in legal settings requires adherence to specific scientific and methodological standards for evidence admissibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature on symptom validity tests (SVTs).
  • To serve as a reference guide for the selection, interpretation, and defense of SVT results.
  • To identify and critique methodological and theoretical weaknesses in SVT research.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic literature review of published research on symptom validity tests.
  • Analysis of methodological and theoretical aspects of SVT research.
  • Development of recommendations for improving the quality and admissibility of SVT data.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant methodological and theoretical limitations in current SVT research.
  • Highlighted the challenges in using SVTs as reliable clinical tools and sources of evidence.
  • Provided tables to aid in the selection, interpretation, and defense of SVT findings.

Conclusions:

  • Conclusions drawn from SVT data must address identified research weaknesses to meet rigorous legal standards.
  • Recommendations are provided for researchers and practitioners to enhance the scientific validity and legal defensibility of SVTs.
  • Further research is needed to overcome current limitations and strengthen the role of SVTs in medico-legal evaluations.