Related Experiment Videos
The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with
1School of Education, University of Miami.Coral Gables, Florida 33124-2040, USA. cenders@miami.edu
Psychological Methods
|January 10, 2002
Summary
Full information maximum-likelihood estimation (FIML) in structural equation models showed less bias and better efficiency with nonnormal data. However, standard errors were biased, and model rejection rates were inflated, though correctives can help.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Quantitative Psychology
- Econometrics
Background:
- Structural equation models (SEMs) often encounter nonnormal indicator variables and missing data.
- Full information maximum-likelihood estimation (FIML) is a common method for handling missing data in SEMs.
- Ad hoc missing data techniques may introduce bias and reduce efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of FIML estimation in SEMs with nonnormal indicator variables.
- To compare FIML with ad hoc missing data techniques under various conditions.
- To assess the impact of missing data patterns, rates, sample size, and distribution shape on estimation.
Main Methods:
- A Monte Carlo simulation was employed to examine FIML estimation.
- Independent variables included missing data algorithm, missing data rate, sample size, and distribution shape.
- Outcome measures comprised parameter estimate bias, parameter estimate efficiency, standard error coverage, and model rejection rates.
Main Results:
- FIML parameter estimates demonstrated less bias and greater efficiency compared to ad hoc methods for missing completely at random and missing at random data.
- Standard errors were negatively biased, and model rejection rates were inflated, similar to complete-data maximum-likelihood estimation.
- Recently developed correctives for missing data showed potential in mitigating issues arising from nonnormal data.
Conclusions:
- FIML offers advantages in parameter estimation accuracy and efficiency for SEMs with nonnormal data and missing values.
- Inflation in standard errors and model rejection rates remain concerns with FIML.
- Corrective methods like rescaled statistics and bootstrapping show promise for improving FIML performance in challenging data conditions.