Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.

C E Lunneborg1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-4322, USA. cliff@ms.washington.edu

Psychological Methods
|January 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some Information-Processing Correlates Of Measures Of Intelligence.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Efron's Bootstrap with Application to the Repeated Measures Design.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Contribution of sex-differentiated experiences to spatial and mechanical reasoning abilities.

Perceptual and motor skills·1984
Same author

Developing prediction weights by matching battery factorings.

Psychometrika·1967
Same author

THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY TO OTHER TEST-TAKING ATTITUDES IN CHILDREN.

Journal of clinical psychology·1964
Same journal

Addressing selective reporting bias in meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A tutorial in R.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneous variance models with Gaussian processes.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new randomization bootstrap method for psychological research, offering more accurate results than traditional t-tests for local population inference. This approach provides better estimates of treatment effects in experimental designs.

Area of Science:

  • Psychological research methodology
  • Statistical inference

Background:

  • Independent-samples t-tests are commonly used in psychological research for comparing two treatments.
  • Previous work by Reichardt and Gollob (1999) highlighted that the t-test can be conservative, leading to inflated P values or overly wide confidence intervals (CIs) for local populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a less conservative method for local population inference in psychological experiments.
  • To introduce a novel approach based on the nonparametric bootstrap for improved statistical accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • The study develops a randomization bootstrap approach inspired by Efron's (1979) nonparametric bootstrap.
  • The performance of the proposed randomization bootstrap is compared against established randomization or permutation tests.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The developed randomization bootstrap method offers a less conservative alternative to the traditional t-test for local population inference.
  • This new method provides more accurate P values and narrower confidence intervals compared to the conservative t-test.

Conclusions:

  • The randomization bootstrap is a valuable tool for enhancing the precision of statistical inference in psychological research.
  • The study underscores the importance of local population inference and its distinction from broader scientific inference.