Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: description and basic qualities.

V H Hildebrandt1, P M Bongers, F J van Dijk

  • 1TNO Work and Employment, AS Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. v.hildebrandt@arbeid.tno.nl

Ergonomics
|January 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experiences with multiple job holding: a qualitative study among Dutch older workers.

BMC public health·2018
Same author

The cost-effectiveness and return-on-investment of a combined social and physical environmental intervention in office employees.

Health education research·2017
Same author

The Role of Vitality in the Relationship Between a Healthy Lifestyle and Societal Costs of Health Care and Lost Productivity: A Mediation Analysis.

American journal of health promotion : AJHP·2016
Same author

Insights into the concept of vitality: associations with participation and societal costs.

European journal of public health·2015
Same author

Prevention program at construction worksites aimed at improving health and work ability is cost-saving to the employer: results from an RCT.

American journal of industrial medicine·2013
Same author

The biomechanical prediction of muscle forces.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

The Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (DMQ) effectively assesses workplace physical demands and ergonomic risks. It helps identify workers needing further ergonomic evaluation for musculoskeletal health.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Ergonomics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Musculoskeletal disorders are a significant occupational health concern.
  • Accurate assessment of workplace physical demands and hazardous conditions is crucial for prevention.
  • Existing tools may not comprehensively cover all relevant workload factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (DMQ).
  • To evaluate the psychometric properties of the DMQ.
  • To assess the DMQ's utility in identifying workers at risk for musculoskeletal symptoms.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a 63-item questionnaire assessing musculoskeletal workload and hazardous working conditions.
  • Categorization of questions into seven indices (force, load, repetition, climate, vibration, ergonomics) and posture questions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Validation using a database of 1575 workers across various occupations.
  • Analysis of homogeneity, divergent validity, and concurrent validity.

    • Main Results:

    • The DMQ comprises seven indices and four posture-related questions, providing a comprehensive overview of musculoskeletal workload.
    • Indices demonstrated satisfactory homogeneity and fair divergent validity against psychosocial factors.
    • The questionnaire successfully differentiated worker groups with varying musculoskeletal loads.
    • Significant associations were found between most indices/factors and low back and/or neck-shoulder symptoms.

    Conclusions:

    • The DMQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing musculoskeletal workload and hazardous working conditions.
    • It serves as a practical inventory for occupational health services.
    • The DMQ aids in identifying worker groups requiring more in-depth ergonomic analysis to mitigate musculoskeletal risks.