Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of group and mixed family-based treatment for childhood obesity
G S Goldfield1, L H Epstein, C K Kilanowski
1Mental Health Research, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Group-based family behavioral treatment is a more cost-effective approach for pediatric obesity management than mixed individual and group formats. This approach offers significant value for reducing childhood obesity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Behavioral Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Family-based behavioral treatment is a recognized effective intervention for pediatric obesity.
- Comparing different delivery protocols is essential for optimizing treatment efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of two family-based behavioral treatment delivery protocols for pediatric obesity.
- To evaluate which treatment format offers a better return on investment in terms of BMI reduction.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving 31 families with obese children.
- Comparison of a mixed (group and individual) treatment protocol versus a group-only protocol.
- Cost-effectiveness calculated as reduction in standardized BMI and percentage overweight per dollar spent.
Main Results:
- The group-only treatment was significantly more cost-effective than the mixed treatment.
- Both protocols yielded similar reductions in Z-BMI and percentage overweight for children and parents.
- The mixed treatment protocol incurred significantly higher delivery costs.
Conclusions:
- Family-based behavioral interventions using group treatment alone are more cost-effective for pediatric obesity.
- This finding supports the implementation of group-only formats for greater economic efficiency in obesity treatment programs.
Objective:
Family-based, behavioral treatment has been shown to be an effective intervention for the management of pediatric obesity. The goal of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two protocols for the delivery of family-based behavioral treatment.
Research Methods And Procedures:
Thirty-one families with obese children were randomized to groups in which families were provided mixed treatment incorporating both group and individualized treatment vs group treatment only. Cost-effectiveness of treatment was defined as the magnitude of reduction in standardized BMI and percentage overweight per dollar spent for recruitment and treatment. Anthropometric data were assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-randomization.
Results:
Results for the 24 families with complete data showed the group intervention was significantly more cost-effective than the mixed treatment. This was due to the similarity between the two groups in Z-BMI or percentage overweight change for children and their parents, while the mixed treatment was significantly more expensive to deliver than the group treatment.
Discussion:
These findings suggest that a family-based, behavioral intervention employing group treatment alone is a more cost-effective approach to treating pediatric obesity than a mixed group plus individual format.
Related Concept Videos
Family Therapy
Strategic Family Therapy
Strategic family therapy emphasizes resolving communication barriers and improving problem-solving abilities...
Group Therapy
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
