Related Experiment Videos
Episodic heavy drinking in four Nordic countries: a comparative survey.
P Mäkelä1, K Fonager, B Hibell
1Alcohol and Drug Research Group, STAKES, Helsinki, Finland. pia.makela@stakes.fi
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
|January 11, 2002
Summary
Binge drinking patterns and intoxication experiences differ across Nordic countries. Even with similar annual alcohol consumption, how people define and experience heavy drinking varies significantly.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Alcohol Research
- Cross-cultural Studies
Background:
- Episodic heavy drinking, commonly known as binge drinking, is a significant public health concern.
- Understanding variations in binge drinking behaviors and their indicators across different cultural contexts is crucial for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare episodic heavy drinking and its various indicators among four Nordic countries.
- To investigate differences in the frequency of intoxication, consumption of six or more drinks at a time (6+), and negative consequences of drinking.
Main Methods:
- A comparative survey was conducted using telephone interviews in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
- Random samples of men and women aged 19-71 years participated in the study.
- Episodic heavy drinking was assessed through self-reported frequency of intoxication, 6+ drinking occasions, and negative consequences, alongside annual consumption and intake per occasion.
Main Results:
- Denmark showed the highest annual consumption and frequency of 6+ drinking, while Norway had the lowest.
- Finland reported the highest frequency of subjective intoxication, which was more prevalent than 6+ drinking occasions.
- Despite similar annual consumption, drinking patterns varied, with Danes exhibiting less concentrated drinking occasions and Norwegians reporting intoxication levels similar to Finns.
Conclusions:
- The relationship between subjective and objective measures of episodic heavy drinking differs considerably across Nordic countries.
- Findings suggest that the definition, social acceptability, and subjective experience of intoxication vary even within a culturally similar region.