Related Experiment Videos
Benchmarks of support in internal medicine residency training programs
Susan D Wolfsthal1, Brent W Beasley, Richard Kopelman
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. swolfsth@medicine.umaryland.edu
Summary
Financial and staff support benchmarks in internal medicine residency programs correlate with board pass rates. Higher faculty numbers and lower program director clinical work, along with reduced pharmaceutical funding, predict better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Residency Training
- Program Administration
Background:
- Internal medicine residency programs require robust financial and staff support for optimal function.
- Understanding the relationship between support structures and training quality is crucial for program improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish benchmarks for financial and staff support in internal medicine residency programs.
- To investigate the correlation between these support benchmarks and program quality indicators, specifically board pass rates.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to member programs of the Association of Program Directors of Internal Medicine.
- Survey data on program support characteristics were correlated with a three-year average of American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination pass rates.
- Bivariate and multivariate analyses were employed to assess correlations and identify predictors.
Main Results:
- 287 of 394 surveys (73%) were completed, primarily by program directors.
- Key support metrics included faculty full-time equivalents (FTEs), resident-to-staff ratios, and program director time allocation.
- Program board pass rates positively correlated with faculty FTEs and negatively with program director clinical workload and pharmaceutical company financial support.
Conclusions:
- Benchmarks for financial and staff support in internal medicine residency programs have been identified.
- Specific support elements, such as faculty numbers and program director workload, are linked to program quality as measured by board pass rates.
- Program directors can utilize these findings to advocate for enhanced administrative and financial resources.