Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy
H N Garb1, J M Wood, M T Nezworski
1Behavioral Health 116A-H, Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 7180 Highland Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206-1297 USA. howard.garb@med.va.gov
Abstract:
Comments are made about the articles comprising the first round of the Special Series on the Rorschach. G. Stricker and J. R. Gold (1999) and D. J. Viglione (1999) praised the Rorschach, but they consistently failed to cite negative findings. R. M. Dawes (1999) obtained results that provide modest support for the Rorschach, but one of his data sets is flawed. J. B. Hiller, R. Rosenthal, R. F. Bornstein, D. T. R. Berry, and S. Brunell-Neuleib (1999) reported the results of a meta-analysis, but, among other problems, their coders were not blind to the results of all the studies. J. Hunsley and J. M. Bailey (1999) made a strong case for concluding that there is no scientific basis for using the Rorschach. Recommendations are made for resolving the Rorschach controversy.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Racemic Mixtures and the Resolution of Enantiomers
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

