Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
The Rorschach: facts, fictions, and future
1California School of Psychology, Alliant International University, 6160 Cornerstone Court, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Abstract:
A large body of empirical evidence supports the reliability, validity, and utility of the Rorschach. This same evidence reveals that the recent criticisms of the Rorschach are largely without merit. This article systematically addresses several significant Rorschach components: interrater and temporal consistency reliability, normative data and diversity, methodological issues, specific applications in the evaluation of thought disorder and suicide, meta-analyses, incremental validity, clinician judgment, patterns of use, and clinical utility. Strengths and weaknesses of the test are addressed, and research recommendations are made. This information should give the reader both an appreciation for the substantial, but often overlooked, research basis for the Rorschach and an appreciation of the challenges that lie ahead.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Hindsight Biases
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Counterfactual Thinking
Magical Thinking
The Influence of Cognition on Affect

