Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Threaded cages for degenerative cervical disease.

Robert J Hacker¹

¹Bobh@oregonneurosurgery.com

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

|January 25, 2002

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Single-level degenerative cervical disc disease and driving disability: results from a prospective, randomized trial.

Global spine journal·2014

Same author

Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site.

Spine·2013

Same author

Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Spine·2008

Same author

Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.

Spine·2007

Same author

Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up.

Journal of spinal disorders & techniques·2007

Same author

Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2005

Cervical cages offer comparable outcomes to traditional fusion methods for anterior interbody fusion, with significantly better fusion rates and reduced donor site morbidity. This suggests cages are a safe and effective alternative for degenerative cervical disc disorders.

Area of Science:

Spine Surgery
Orthopedic Devices
Biomaterials

Background:

Anterior interbody fusion in the cervical spine lacks a universally superior technique.
Traditional methods include allograft or autograft fusion, often associated with donor site morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel cervical cage for anterior interbody fusion.
To compare cervical cage outcomes against established allograft and autograft fusion techniques.

Main Methods:

A device evaluation study incorporating a multicenter trial and a long-term follow-up study.
Comparison of fusion rates, clinical outcomes, and donor site morbidity between cervical cage and control groups.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

The multicenter trial showed comparable outcomes but significantly higher fusion rates with cervical cages.
Both studies reported high donor site morbidity in the autograft control group.
Long-term follow-up indicated a trend toward better outcomes with cervical cages.

Conclusions:

Cervical interbody fusion cages are a safe and effective treatment option for degenerative cervical disc disorders.
Cervical cages effectively avoid the iliac crest donor site morbidity associated with autograft fusion.