An audit of hip radiographs performed for general practitioners
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Aim:
We carried out a prospective study of the GP referrals for hip radiographs to find out the proportion of radiographs falling within the RCR guidelines and to ascertain the reasons for not following the guidelines.
Materials And Methods:
One thousand two hundred and fifty six consecutive hip radiographs were performed for GPs over a 12-month period. Questionnaires were sent to GPs for 873 referrals during an audit period of 18 months Four hundred and fifty three questionnaires were returned with adequate information. The proportion of change in management between the patients falling within the guidelines and those outside the guidelines was compared using Fisher's Exact Test (SPSS Package Version 9) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.
Results:
Only 194 (43%) of the 453 referrals were within RCR guidelines and 259 (57%) were outside guidelines. In the group where RCR guidelines were followed, 60% were normal, 34% had degenerative changes and 6% other diagnoses. The radiological reports changed management in 44%. In the group where guidelines were not followed 76% were normal, 18% had degenerative changes and 6% other diagnoses. The radiological reports changed management in 37%. There was no evidence of difference in the change in management between these two groups. Twenty per cent of the radiographs showed abnormalities other than hip changes. Of these, only 17% were abnormalities other than degenerative changes and considered significant.
Conclusions:
This audit does not reveal why the majority of the requests fell outside guidelines. This may be due to lack of awareness amongst GPs about guidelines, patient pressure, medico-legal problems and the need for reassurance. However, the audit does not show any evidence that following guidelines would increase efficiency of referral.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...