Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Monitoring of controlled accommodative esotropia.

E L Raab1

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University, New York, New York, USA.

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
|January 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent esotropia.

Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus·2014
Same author

Ophthalmic findings in a patient with CD8-positive T cell lymphoma and a hydroa vacciniforme-like eruption.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2010
Same author

Construction and test of phase zone plates for x-ray microscopy.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Soft-x-ray projection lithography: printing of 0.2-microm features using a 20:1 reduction.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Atomic-density-dependent losses in an optical trap.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Follow-up monitoring of accommodative esotropia.

Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus·2001
Same journal

The Utility of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Masked Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2018
Same journal

Autoimmune Retinopathy: Current Concepts and Practices (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2018
Same journal

Erratum: Predictors of Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Wide Versus Narrower Angles (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2018
Same journal

The Relationship Between Ocular Itch, Ocular Pain, and Dry Eye Symptoms (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2018
Same journal

The Effects of Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation on Anatomical and Functional Parameters in Patients with Primary Angle Closure: A Prospective Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2017
Same journal

Predictors of Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Wide Versus Narrower Angles (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2017
See all related articles

For most patients with accommodative esotropia, monitoring every 9 to 12 months is sufficient for the first two years. Decompensation risk is low within this period, independent of refractive changes or treatment needs.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Ophthalmology
  • Strabismus Management

Background:

  • Accommodative esotropia is a common form of strabismus in children.
  • Determining optimal follow-up intervals is crucial for timely intervention and preventing decompensation.
  • Previous studies have not definitively established the ideal monitoring frequency for controlled accommodative esotropia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine an appropriate examination interval for monitoring accommodative esotropia.
  • To assess if the chosen interval increases the risk of detecting decompensation.
  • To evaluate the impact of supplemental nonoperative treatment on decompensation risk.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 63 patients with controlled accommodative esotropia.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of examination intervals (3-6 months), age at first control, decompensation occurrence, refractive status, and treatment needs.
  • Comparison of outcomes between patients who decompensated and those who did not.

    • Main Results:

    • Decompensation occurred in 11 patients, with no clear association with refractive changes.
    • No decompensation was observed within the first 12 months; only 11.5% occurred within 2 years.
    • Age at onset (before or after 48 months) did not significantly influence the rate of decompensation.

    Conclusions:

    • Monitoring controlled accommodative esotropia every 9-12 months is adequate for most patients over the first two years.
    • This interval appears safe, not increasing the risk of untimely decompensation detection.
    • Refractive error changes and supplemental treatment needs were not strongly linked to decompensation risk.