Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Who's rating you?

D Scalise

    Hospitals & Health Networks
    |January 19, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary

    Online healthcare quality rating websites are rapidly increasing, with more employers, payers, and consumers using them. Hospitals must engage with these sites to ensure fair quality assessments and maintain their role in healthcare discussions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Proteins secreted by embryonic stem cells activate cardiomyocytes through ligand binding pathways.

    Journal of proteomics·2010
    Same author

    Cardiac fibroblasts influence cardiomyocyte phenotype in vitro.

    American journal of physiology. Cell physiology·2007
    Same author

    Effect of muscle origin and phenotype on satellite cell muscle-specific gene expression.

    Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology·2003
    Same author

    Six sigma. The quest for quality.

    Hospitals & health networks·2002
    Same author

    HIPAA lawsuits. See you in court.

    Hospitals & health networks·2002
    Same author

    Patient safety. Dial 11 for safety.

    Hospitals & health networks·2002

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Management
    • Health Information Technology
    • Quality Measurement

    Background:

    • The proliferation of online healthcare provider quality rating websites is a significant trend.
    • Employers, payers, and consumers are increasingly relying on these platforms for decision-making.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the growing influence of online quality rating websites.
    • To urge healthcare providers, particularly hospitals, to actively participate in the quality assessment discourse.

    Main Methods:

    • This study is a conceptual analysis and commentary based on current trends in healthcare quality assessment.
    • It synthesizes observations on the rise of third-party rating sites and their impact.

    Main Results:

    • A substantial increase in the number and usage of healthcare quality rating websites has been observed.
    • A critical perspective suggests many of these sites may be based on flawed methodologies.

    Conclusions:

    • Hospitals face a risk of being evaluated by invalid or unfair standards if they do not engage with these rating systems.
    • Proactive engagement is crucial for hospitals to influence and shape the criteria used for quality evaluation.

    Related Experiment Videos