Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes?

Manuela Piazza1, Andrea Mechelli, Brian Butterworth

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom. piazza@shfj.cea.fr

Neuroimage
|January 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effect of Age on Post-Stroke Language Outcomes.

Journal of aging research·2026
Same author

Stressful life events and their association with symptom severity and functioning in first-episode psychosis.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

SONIVA database: Speech recognition validation in aphasia.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

Reading ability in both deaf and hearing adults is linked to neural representations of abstract phonology derived from visual speech.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Object Naming After Thalamic Damage: Evidence From a Large-Scale, Chronic-Phase Study of Left Hemisphere Stroke Survivors.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Neural Origins of Ear-EEG: A Correlation Study Using Scalp EEG Source Reconstruction.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Hysteresis effects in visual and auditory perception and the comparison of underlying neural mechanisms - an EEG study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Short-term audio-tactile training affects cortical auditory speech-envelope tracking for incongruent but not congruent stimuli.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Dissociable Neurocognitive Mechanisms of State and Trait Anxiety in Working Memory: Threat-Induced Alterations in Decision Dynamics and Attenuation of Large-Scale Network Reconfiguration.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neuro-Ocular Amyloid Characterization in Alzheimer's Disease via Cross-Site PET-MRI and Hierarchical Cross-Attention Driven Multimodal Representation Learning.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Whole-brain network dynamics underlying intolerance of uncertainty.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Subitizing and counting numbers utilize overlapping brain networks, primarily in the occipitoparietal regions. This suggests these numerical cognition processes are not separate but rather part of a continuous system.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Subitizing (fast, accurate enumeration of ≤4 items) and counting (>4 items) are distinct numerical processing modes.
  • Theories debate whether subitizing and counting are separate processes or points on a complexity continuum.
  • Neural underpinnings of subitizing versus counting remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of subitizing and counting using Positron Emission Tomography (PET).
  • To determine if subitizing and counting involve separate or overlapping neural systems.
  • To examine how numerosity and spatial arrangement modulate these neural processes.

Main Methods:

  • PET imaging was used while subjects performed enumeration tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Visual arrays varied in dot numerosity (1-4 for subitizing, 6-9 for counting) and spatial arrangement (canonical, random).
  • Analysis focused on brain activation patterns in extrastriate and intraparietal areas.

    • Main Results:

    • A common neural network involving extrastriate middle occipital and intraparietal areas was identified for both subitizing and counting.
    • Activation intensity and spatial extent increased with numerosity and random spatial arrangement, peaking during counting.
    • Counting showed greater activation within this network compared to subitizing; subitizing did not show unique activation areas.

    Conclusions:

    • Subitizing and counting share a common neural substrate, challenging theories of separable processes.
    • These numerical cognition functions appear to exist along a continuum of neural complexity rather than distinct systems.
    • The findings support a unified neural basis for enumeration across different numerosities.