Related Experiment Videos
Dissociations in processing past tense morphology: neuropathology and behavioral studies
Lorraine K Tyler1, Paul deMornay-Davies, Rebekah Anokhina
1Centre for Speech and Language, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK. lktyler@csl.psychol.cam.ac.uk
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|January 19, 2002
Summary
Brain damage can separate regular and irregular past tense processing, suggesting distinct neural systems. Nonfluent aphasic patients with left hemisphere damage showed impaired regular past tense but intact irregular past tense processing.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Linguistics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Past tense inflectional morphology (regular vs. irregular) dissociates in brain-damaged patients.
- This dissociation challenges single-system connectionist models and supports dual-system rule-based accounts.
- Neuropathology and behavioral data offer critical constraints for linguistic rule theories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural basis of regular and irregular past tense processing.
- To test competing computational models of past tense morphology using patient data.
- To correlate specific brain damage patterns with distinct processing deficits.
Main Methods:
- Tested nonfluent aphasic patients (left hemisphere damage) and semantic deficit patients (HSE, temporal lobe damage).
- Employed a large priming study to assess regular and irregular past tense priming.
- Utilized an elicitation task to evaluate irregular past tense performance.
Main Results:
- Nonfluent aphasic patients showed no regular past tense priming but significant irregular past tense priming.
- Control participants exhibited priming for both regular and irregular past tenses.
- HSE patients demonstrated significantly impaired irregular past tense performance in an elicitation task.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral and neuropathological findings suggest separable yet interdependent systems for regular and irregular past tense processing.
- Evidence supports distinct neural substrates for rule-based regular past tense and lexicon-based irregular past tense.
- The study provides strong constraints for computational models of language processing in the brain.