Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Laser-Induced Fluorescence Emission (L.I.F.E.) as Novel Non-Invasive Tool for In-Situ Measurements of Biomarkers in Cryospheric Habitats
Published on: October 26, 2019
Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced
M Ando1, M H van Der Veen, B R Schemehorn
1Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2876, USA. mando@iupui.edu
Quantitative laser-induced fluorescence (QLF I and QLF II) effectively quantifies mineral loss in early deciduous dental caries. These methods showed higher accuracy in deciduous teeth compared to permanent teeth for caries diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Dental research
- Biophotonics
- Caries diagnostics
Background:
- Dental caries affects both primary (deciduous) and permanent teeth, progressing faster in primary enamel.
- New diagnostic methods for early caries detection require validation on deciduous teeth.
- Quantitative laser-induced fluorescence (QLF I and QLF II) show promise for quantifying mineral loss but have primarily been tested on permanent dentition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the efficacy of QLF I and QLF II in quantifying mineral loss from early carious lesions in both deciduous and permanent teeth.
- To assess the correlation between fluorescence changes measured by QLF and mineral loss determined by transverse microradiography (TMR).
Main Methods:
- Thirty deciduous and 30 permanent teeth were artificially demineralized to create carious lesions.
- Enamel demineralization was assessed using both QLF I and QLF II to measure changes in fluorescence radiance (Delta F).
- Lesion depth and integrated mineral loss (IML) were quantified using transverse microradiography (TMR) as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- A strong correlation was observed between QLF I and QLF II measurements in both deciduous (r=0.96) and permanent teeth (r=0.98).
- In deciduous teeth, Delta F showed good correlation with TMR for lesion depth and IML (r=0.76-0.88).
- In permanent teeth, the correlation between Delta F and TMR was weaker (r=0.07-0.62).
Conclusions:
- Both QLF I and QLF II are capable of quantifying mineral loss in early carious lesions in deciduous teeth.
- The accuracy of QLF methods for quantifying mineral loss in early caries is slightly higher in deciduous teeth than in permanent teeth under the study conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Photoluminescence: Applications
Fluorescence and Phosphorescence: Instrumentation
Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

