Related Experiment Videos
The problem of unilateral and bilateral neck dissection
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
|September 1, 1975
Summary
Neck dissection survival rates were significantly lower for bilateral resections (4.9%) compared to unilateral (37%). Prophylactic neck dissection is not recommended due to immunobiological factors, but indicated for T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer
Background:
- Neck dissections are crucial surgical procedures for head and neck cancers.
- Understanding the impact of unilateral versus bilateral dissections on patient outcomes is vital.
- Immunobiological factors may influence the efficacy of cancer treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the survival outcomes of unilateral and bilateral neck resections for various head and neck tumors.
- To evaluate the indications for prophylactic versus therapeutic neck dissections.
- To correlate surgical approach with immunologic considerations in head and neck cancer management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 270 neck dissections (unilateral and bilateral) performed between 1960-1970.
- Separate analysis of radical resections for laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, and skin carcinomas.
- Consideration of immunologic factors in treatment strategy.
Main Results:
- Survival rates were 37% for 209 unilateral resections and 4.9% for 61 bilateral resections.
- Analysis revealed specific patterns for laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, and skin cancers.
- Histologically positive lymph nodes were frequently observed in T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic block resection is discouraged due to potential negative impact on immunobiological anti-tumor responses.
- Neck evacuation (dissection) is indicated for T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas due to high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
- Surgical strategy should consider tumor stage and potential immune system involvement.