Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alloplastic implants for orbital wall reconstruction.

A A Jacono1, B Moskowitz

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, 310 East 14th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|January 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nasal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Grafting of the peritonsillar fossa with an acellular dermal graft to reduce posttonsillectomy pain.

American journal of otolaryngology·2001
Same author

Endoscopic forehead lifting and contouring.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2001
Same author

Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous approach in upper and lower blepharoplasty.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2001
Same author

Metaplastic bone formation in nasal polyps with histologic presence of transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFbeta-1) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs).

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2001
Same author

Evaluation of acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) sheet for soft tissue augmentation: a 1-year follow-up of clinical observations and histological findings.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
Same journal

In-Office Surgical Procedures for Prejuvenation.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Neck Contouring Prejuvenation Techniques.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Lip Rejuvenation Options in the Youthful Population.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Impact of Functional Rhinoplasty on Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

The Use of Muscle-Hitch and Internal Gradual Tension Quilting Sutures for Eyebrow Lift Using an Open Temple Approach.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
See all related articles

Porous polyethylene implants offer a stable, biocompatible solution for orbital wall reconstruction, promoting tissue ingrowth and reducing complications associated with traditional nonabsorbable implants.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Ophthalmic Surgery
  • Medical Device Engineering

Background:

  • Nonabsorbable alloplastic implants are widely used for orbital wall reconstruction due to availability and stability.
  • Complications such as migration, extrusion, hemorrhage, and infection arise from the lack of host tissue integration.
  • Porous polyethylene implants offer a novel alternative with tissue ingrowth potential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a surgical approach for orbital defect reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of porous polyethylene compared to other nonabsorbable alloplasts.
  • To highlight the benefits of porous polyethylene in supporting tissue ingrowth and structural stability.

Main Methods:

  • Surgical technique for orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reconstruction of orbital floor, superior, medial, and lateral wall defects.
  • Comparative discussion of various nonabsorbable alloplastic materials.

    • Main Results:

    • Porous polyethylene implants demonstrate effective tissue integration in vivo.
    • The semirigid structure provides essential orbital stability.
    • Malleability allows for precise contouring during surgical reconstruction.

    Conclusions:

    • Porous polyethylene implants represent a significant advancement in orbital reconstruction.
    • They offer improved outcomes by mitigating complications associated with traditional implants.
    • Their properties support successful and stable orbital wall repair.