Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Oromandibular reconstruction.

D G Farwell1, N D Futran

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Box 356515, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|January 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study.

Journal of dental research·2020
Same author

Use of a non-ICU specialty ward for immediate post-operative management of head and neck free flaps; a randomized controlled trial.

Oral oncology·2019
Same author

Pathological margins and advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale·2019
Same author

Autofluorescence lifetime augmented reality as a means for real-time robotic surgery guidance in human patients.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy for the diagnosis of oral lichen planus.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2018
Same author

Efficacy of laryngectomy alone for treatment of locally advanced laryngeal cancer: A stage- and subsite-specific survival analysis.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2017
Same journal

In-Office Surgical Procedures for Prejuvenation.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Neck Contouring Prejuvenation Techniques.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Lip Rejuvenation Options in the Youthful Population.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Impact of Functional Rhinoplasty on Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

The Use of Muscle-Hitch and Internal Gradual Tension Quilting Sutures for Eyebrow Lift Using an Open Temple Approach.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
See all related articles

Oromandibular reconstruction, especially for the mandible, presents significant challenges. Free flap reconstruction offers superior outcomes for bony defects, improving healing and reducing complications in head and neck surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Head and Neck Surgery
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Oromandibular reconstruction is complex, demanding restoration of function (occlusion, speech, swallowing, mastication) and aesthetics.
  • Achieving ideal outcomes requires individualized treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
  • Reconstruction must address both hard (mandible) and soft tissues, including the temporomandibular joint.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the challenges and goals of oromandibular reconstruction.
  • To review various rehabilitative options for mandibular defects.
  • To highlight the benefits of free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on oromandibular reconstruction techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of indications for different reconstructive approaches (non-reconstruction, plating, free flaps).
  • Analysis of outcomes, including primary healing and wound complications associated with free flaps.

    • Main Results:

    • Free flap reconstruction is often superior for bony defects, leading to better primary healing and fewer complications.
    • Individualized approaches are crucial for optimizing speech, swallowing, mastication, and cosmetic results.
    • Specific challenges in temporomandibular joint reconstruction are addressed.

    Conclusions:

    • Free flaps are generally the preferred method for bony oromandibular reconstruction due to improved outcomes.
    • Careful patient selection and individualized surgical planning are essential for successful oromandibular rehabilitation.
    • Understanding the merits of different flaps guides reconstructive decision-making in head and neck surgery.