Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protocols and guidelines in critical care: development and implementation.

J J Hammond1

  • 1Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA. hammond@umdnj.edu

Current Opinion in Critical Care
|January 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term renoprotection by perindopril or nifedipine in non-hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2004
Same author

Long-term comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2001
Same author

Treatment of giardiasis.

Postgraduate medicine·1996
Same author

A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group.

Blood pressure·1993
Same author

A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.

American journal of hypertension·1993
Same author

The Belle Maudsley memorial lecture 1986. Treatment of maxillary retrusion in a case of cleft lip and palate.

Dental update·1987

Clinical guidelines help standardize intensive care unit (ICU) care, reducing complications and improving patient outcomes. Evidence-based medicine in critical care faces challenges, but guidelines show success in areas like sedation and ventilation.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Clinical guideline development

Background:

  • Clinical management variation is linked to poor patient outcomes and higher healthcare costs.
  • Standardization of care through guidelines, protocols, and clinical pathways aims to reduce variation.
  • This strategy seeks to decrease complications, shorten hospital stays, and enhance patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution and impact of clinical guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs).
  • To highlight the challenges in applying evidence-based medicine principles to critical care.
  • To identify successful applications of ICU-based guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on clinical management variation and guideline implementation in ICUs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials within critical care settings.
  • Identification of specific clinical areas where ICU guidelines have demonstrated success.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical guidelines are a key strategy for standardizing care and mitigating negative outcomes in ICUs.
    • The complex nature of critical care presents significant hurdles for traditional evidence-based medicine research.
    • Guidelines have proven effective in areas such as sedation, ventilator management, antibiotic selection, and vascular interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardizing clinical management through guidelines is crucial for improving ICU care quality and efficiency.
    • Overcoming research limitations in critical care is necessary for robust guideline development.
    • Successful implementation of guidelines in specific ICU domains demonstrates their potential to enhance patient care.