O(2) delivery and the venous P(O(2))-O(2) uptake relationship in pump-perfused canine muscle

Under the conditions of both an increased red cell affinity for O(2) at a constant rate of O(2) delivery (arterial O(2) content x flow) and a decrease in the rate of O(2) delivery induced by hypoxic hypoxia at constant blood flow, we have obtained a linear relationship between the partial pressure of O(2) in the muscle venous effluent (P(v,)(O(2))) and O(2) uptake (.V(O(2))). The relationship is described by the equation .V(O(2)) = D(a) x P(v,)(O(2)) + .V(O(2)conv)) where D(a) is the apparent O(2) diffusion capacity and .V(O(2)conv)) is O(2) delivery-limited .V(O(2)), and D(a) x P(v,)(O(2)) represents the O(2) diffusion-limited .V(O(2)) .V(O(2)diff)). From these observations, we propose the hypothesis that .V(O(2)) consists of two additive values, .V(O(2)conv)) and .V(O(2)diff)). The mechanism underlying the reduction in .V(O(2)) that is induced by reducing O(2) delivery to markedly below the .V(O(2)conv)) value has only been investigated using a model based on the single compartment of diffusion-limited .V(O(2)), and has not been investigated in terms of this additive .V(O(2)) model. The single compartment analysis appears to overestimate the role of O(2) diffusion in limiting the reduction of .V(O(2)) that occurs in response to a decrease in O(2) diffusion capacity, as reflected by the .V(O(2))/P(v,)(O(2)) ratio. To gain better insight into the mechanism involved, we altered the rate of O(2) delivery by changing arterial P(O(2)) from normoxia (with inhalation of air) to hypoxia (by inhalation of 10-11 % O(2)) and blood flow (with high and low flow rates (n = 7 for both groups), and very low and ischaemic flow rates (n = 4 for both groups)) in pump-perfused dog gastrocnemius preparations during tetanic isometric contractions at 1 Hz. As rates of O(2) delivery were reduced from 23.2 to 10.9 ml min(-1) (100 g)(-1), significant decreases in P(v,)(O(2)) and .V(O(2)) were observed (P < 0.05). From the data of P(v,)(O(2)) and .V(O(2)) values within this range of O(2) delivery rates, we obtained the regression equation .V(O(2)) = 0.22 x P(v,)(O(2)) + 8.14 (r = 0.58). From the equation, the intercept of the .V(O(2))-axis was significantly different from zero (P < 0.05), in accordance with the observation that the .V(O(2)) /P(v,)(O(2)) ratio (ml min(-1) (100 g)(-1) Torr(-1)) increased from 0.54 to 1.35 (P < 0.05). However, at extremely low rates of O(2) delivery (5.6 and 7.3 ml min(-1) (100 g)(-1) the .V(O(2))/P(v,)(O(2)) ratio was 1.51 and 2.80 (P < 0.05), respectively. This indicates a break in the linear .V(O(2))-P(v,)(O(2)) relationship as the rate of O(2) delivery was reduced to below the .V(O(2)conv)) value of the .V(O(2))-axis intercept. These results suggest that the reduction in .V(O(2)) caused by extreme reductions in the rate of O(2) delivery is not attributable to a reduction in O(2) diffusion capacity, as expected from the .V(O(2))/P(v,)(O(2)) ratio, but to a reduction in the O(2) delivery-limited .V(O(2)) component, as evaluated by the .V(O(2))-axis intercept of the linear .V(O(2))-P(v,)(O(2)) relationship.