Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benefit-cost and cost-effectiveness analysis: theory and application.

N J McCarthy

    Developments in Biological Standardization
    |January 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary

    Benefit-cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis are economic tools for program evaluation. While benefit-cost analysis faces practical challenges, cost-effectiveness analysis offers a more feasible approach for health planning.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The impact and indications for Oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment recommendations when third-party funding is unavailable.

    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology·2018
    Same author

    A Medium-Throughput Single Cell CRISPR-Cas9 Assay to Assess Gene Essentiality.

    Biological procedures online·2015
    Same author

    Critical review of the management of early-stage breast cancer in elderly women.

    Internal medicine journal·2007
    Same author

    Tumor markers: should we or shouldn't we?

    Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)·2001
    Same author

    Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation: early promise and limitations.

    The oncologist·2000
    Same author

    Update on adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Health economics
    • Program evaluation
    • Public health policy

    Background:

    • Benefit-cost analysis (BCA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) are increasingly used in health planning.
    • The theoretical underpinnings of these economic techniques are often misunderstood or misapplied.
    • Formal economic evaluation methods are crucial for resource allocation in healthcare.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the theory of benefit-cost analysis.
    • To explore its application in selecting optimal program size and efficient alternatives.
    • To highlight the practical utility and challenges of cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of benefit-cost analysis theory.
    • Examination of cost-effectiveness analysis principles.
    • Illustrative examples from World Health Organization (WHO) and medical literature.

    Main Results:

    • Benefit-cost analysis offers potential for optimizing program size and economic efficiency.
    • Quantification difficulties and political factors limit the application of benefit-cost analysis.
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis proves to be a more practical and acceptable evaluation tool.

    Conclusions:

    • Cost-effectiveness analysis is a valuable and more readily applicable method for health program evaluation.
    • Understanding the economic basis of these analyses is crucial for effective health planning.
    • The choice between BCA and CEA depends on data availability and decision-making context.

    Related Experiment Videos