Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two eccentricity-dependent limitations on subjective contour discrimination.

Frédéric J A M Poirier1, Rick Gurnsey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.

Vision Research
|January 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Head-Eye Coordination Increases with Age and Varies across Countries.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2015
Same author

Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading.

Journal of vision·2013
Same author

Optimal faces for gender and expression: a new technique for measuring dynamic templates used in face perception.

Journal of vision·2012
Same author

Eccentricity dependence of the curveball illusion.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2012
Same author

Clouds are not normal occluders, and other oddities: more interactions between textures and lightness illusions.

Journal of vision·2012
Same author

Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?

Journal of vision·2011

Spatial discrimination sensitivity losses at different visual eccentricities often require specific scaling factors. This study found that a single scaling factor is insufficient, revealing two distinct factors are necessary to fully account for these visual performance changes.

Area of Science:

  • Vision Science
  • Perception Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Eccentricity-dependent sensitivity losses impact spatial discrimination.
  • Existing scaling functions may not fully capture all visual limitations across retinal locations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a method for determining if a single scaling factor adequately explains eccentricity-dependent sensitivity losses.
  • To investigate the number of scaling factors required for subjective contour stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Applied a novel methodology to subjective contour stimuli with varying aperture size (sigma) and carrier wavelength (omega).
  • Measured threshold scale at different eccentricities and fitted data to rectangular parabolas.
  • Analyzed residuals to identify systematic deviations from single scaling functions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A single scaling factor (E(2)) explained a significant portion of the data variability.
  • Systematic variances were observed in the residuals, indicating limitations of a single scaling factor.
  • The analysis demonstrated that two scaling factors are necessary to capture all eccentricity-dependent limitations.

Conclusions:

  • A single scaling function is insufficient to explain all eccentricity-dependent sensitivity losses in spatial discrimination tasks.
  • Two distinct scaling factors are required to accurately model the observed visual performance changes across retinal eccentricities.
  • This finding has implications for understanding and correcting visual field deficits.