Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

ERP and EOG responses elicited by deviant tones when presented with and without standard tones to reading subjects.

T Ruusuvirta1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. timor@avocado.pc.helsinki.fi

International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
|January 29, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hippocampus responds to auditory change in rabbits.

Neuroscience·2010
Same author

Dose-related effects of memantine on a mismatch negativity-like response in anesthetized rats.

Neuroscience·2010
Same author

Mismatch negativity for item rather than serial-order information in a 150-ms tone series that is not repeated as a melodic pattern.

Neuroscience·2007
Same author

The fast detection of rare auditory feature conjunctions in the human brain as revealed by cortical gamma-band electroencephalogram.

Neuroscience·2004
Same author

Differences in pitch between tones affect behaviour even when incorrectly identified in direction.

Neuropsychologia·2001
Same author

Somatosensory event-related potentials in the rabbit cerebral and cerebellar cortices: a correspondence with mismatch responses in humans.

Neuroscience letters·2001

Reading a book effectively suppresses responses to infrequent oddball-deviants but not alone-deviants, as measured by event-related potentials (ERPs) and electro-oculograms (HEOGs). This suggests reading’s cognitive load impacts auditory distraction processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) and horizontal electro-oculograms (HEOGs) are electrophysiological measures used to study brain responses to stimuli.
  • Auditory distraction and its modulation by cognitive tasks are crucial areas in understanding attention and perception.
  • The mismatch negativity (MMN) and N1 components of ERPs reflect pre-attentive and attentive auditory processing, respectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of a demanding cognitive task (reading) on the processing of auditory deviant stimuli.
  • To differentiate the effects of embedded (oddball-deviants) versus isolated (alone-deviants) auditory distractors.
  • To examine the interplay between cognitive load, auditory distraction, and electrophysiological responses (ERPs and HEOGs).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Recording ERPs and HEOGs in 11 participants under different auditory stimulus conditions (oddball-deviants, alone-deviants).
  • Implementing a reading task during stimulus presentation to simulate a high cognitive load scenario.
  • Utilizing an additional counting task to compare with the reading condition and further probe attentive processing.

Main Results:

  • Oddball-deviants elicited mismatch negativity (MMN) and, in the counting condition, P3b, indicating pre-attentive and attentive processing.
  • Alone-deviants elicited a prominent N1 component in ERPs.
  • Horizontal electro-oculograms (HEOGs) were unaffected by oddball-deviants during reading or counting but showed robust responses to alone-deviants during reading.

Conclusions:

  • Reading imposes a cognitive load sufficient to allow subjects to ignore embedded auditory distractors (oddball-deviants).
  • However, this cognitive load does not prevent responses to isolated auditory distractors (alone-deviants), suggesting different processing pathways.
  • The findings highlight the selective nature of attentional filtering under demanding cognitive conditions.