Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time dependent memory decay.

Paul Jenkins1, Giulia Earle-Richardson, David Tucker Slingerland

  • 1The New York Center for Agricultural Medicine and Health, Cooperstown, NY 12095, USA.

American Journal of Industrial Medicine
|January 29, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

U.S. and Swedish primary care physicians' views on promoting healthy lifestyles: a qualitative study.

BMC primary care·2026
Same author

Predictive value of inferior mesenteric artery size in type 2 endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

CVIR endovascular·2026
Same author

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Patients With Tandem Occlusion Thrombectomy: Analysis From the ASSIST International Registry.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Patient's Age Impact on Stroke Risk and Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion: SCENT Flow Diverter Study-A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial on Large and Giant Aneurysms.

Neurosurgery practice·2026
Same author

Intrinsic differences in hamster and mouse macrophage biology correlate with susceptibility to Leishmania donovani infection.

Journal of leukocyte biology·2026
Same author

Farming Becomes More Precarious With Age: Injury in Maine Agricultural Communities, 2008-2022, via Time Series Analysis.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Health Impacts of the World Trade Center Disaster-A Call to Study Those Exposed at a Young Age.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing Among Injured Workers in Washington State: 2017-2020 Trends and Policy Effects.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Life in the Driver's Seat: A Qualitative Analysis of Rideshare Drivers' Perspectives of Their Work and Well-Being Using Reddit Posts.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Response to Healthcare Workers' Workplace Violence in Colombia.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, but Not to Dust or Fluorides, in the Norwegian Aluminum Industry Is Associated With Accelerated Annual Decline in Lung Function.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Water, Rest, and Shade: Advancing Farmworker Heat Protection Through Partnership.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
See all related articles

Injury recall periods longer than two months significantly underestimate injury rates. Shorter recall periods provide more accurate data for injury surveillance and research.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Estimating injury rates is crucial for public health initiatives.
  • Memory decay can affect the accuracy of self-reported injury data.
  • Previous studies have not fully addressed the impact of recall duration on injury rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the effect of different recall periods on reported annual injury rates.
  • To identify the optimal recall duration for accurate injury data collection.
  • To inform future epidemiological studies on injury surveillance.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of injury data from three independent studies.
  • Subjects recalled injuries over distinct timeframes: 2 months, 12 months, and 10 years.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis to compare injury rates across different recall periods.

    • Main Results:

    • Annual injury rates varied significantly based on recall period: 108/1,000 (2 months), 66/1,000 (12 months), and 19/1,000 (10 years).
    • All observed differences in injury rates were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
    • Methodological and demographic factors were excluded as confounding variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Recall periods exceeding two months substantially underestimate true injury incidence.
    • Shorter recall periods (e.g., 2 months) yield more reliable estimates of injury rates.
    • Findings have implications for designing injury surveillance systems and epidemiological research.