Related Experiment Videos
[Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
F J Roeters1, N J Opdam, R C Burgersdijk
1Vakgroep Cariologie en Endodontologie, faculteit der Medische Wetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen.
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde
|October 1, 1992
Summary
Amalgam
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Restorative dentistry
Context:
- Amalgam's perceived toxicity lacks scientific evidence.
- Adhesive restorations offer alternatives for posterior teeth.
Purpose:
- Evaluate adhesive restorations as alternatives to amalgam.
- Assess composite resin suitability for primary caries and larger defects.
Summary:
- Direct composite resin restorations are advantageous for primary caries.
- Indirect adhesive techniques have limited long-term data.
- Both composite resin and amalgam may be necessary for posterior restorations.
Impact:
- Informs clinical decisions on restorative material selection.
- Highlights the need for further research on indirect adhesive techniques.