Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus motion and retrospective time judgments.

John Predebon1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. johnp@psych.usyd.edu.au

Acta Psychologica
|February 1, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Stimulus motion affects time perception. Moderate changes in motion direction, not speed, influence retrospective timing, lengthening perceived duration. This impacts models of how we judge time.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decrement of the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions: the effects of inspection and practice.

Psychological research·2005
Same author

A comparison of length-matching and length-fractionation measures of Müller-lyer distortions.

Perception & psychophysics·2005
Same author

Selective attention and asymmetry in the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2005
Same author

Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

Influence of the Poggendorff illusion on manual pointing.

Perceptual and motor skills·2004
Same author

Errors of binocular fixation are common in normal subjects during natural conditions.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2003

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychophysics
  • Human perception

Background:

  • Retrospective timing is crucial for understanding temporal cognition.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing time judgments, including stimulus characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of stimulus motion, specifically speed and changes in direction, on retrospective time judgments.
  • To examine the relationship between motion patterns and the perceived duration of an interval.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using a 32-second interval filled with a moving visual element on a computer monitor.
  • Stimulus motion varied in path (horizontal, circular), speed (1-20 cm/s), and frequency of direction changes (1-16 s intervals).
  • Participants reproduced the duration of the presented interval.

Main Results:

  • Stimulus speed did not systematically influence temporal reproductions.
  • A nonmonotonic relationship was observed between remembered duration and the frequency of motion-direction changes.
  • Moderate rates of motion-direction changes led to lengthened remembered durations, while infrequent or very frequent changes had no effect.

Conclusions:

  • The frequency of motion-direction changes, rather than stimulus speed, is a significant factor in retrospective timing.
  • Findings support change models of retrospective timing.
  • Stimulus motion direction changes are more critical than speed for retrospective duration estimation.

Related Experiment Videos