Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minilaparoscopic appendectomy.

B D Matthews1, G Mostafa, K L Harold

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA. bmatthews@carolinas.org

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
|February 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for postoperative analgesia after open total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised comparative trial.

Anaesthesia reports·2026
Same author

Machine learning, deep learning and hernia surgery. Are we pushing the limits of abdominal core health? A qualitative systematic review.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Preservation of deep epigastric perforators during anterior component separation technique (ACST) results in equivalent wound complications compared to transversus abdominis release (TAR).

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2023
Same author

National epidemiologic trends (2008-2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2022
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement.

BJS open·2021
Same journal

Laparoscopic Intragastric Submucosal Dissection (LISD) for Early Gastric Cancer: An Organ-Preserving Alternative When ESD Is Not Feasible.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

The Ring of Protection Sign: A Novel Ultrasound Marker to Standardize Hydrodissection Safety in Thermal Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Sac Excision at the Time of Surgery Can Predict Hernia Recurrences and a Need for Reoperation in Patients.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of PET/CT for the Detection of Synchronous Malignant Lesions in Patients With Endoscopically Obstructive Colorectal Cancer.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Single-Port Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Novel Approach With FishBowl-Early Case Series.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Real-World Outcomes of Barbed Versus Interrupted Sutures for Laparoscopic Choledochotomy: A 12-Month Follow-Up in Patients With Choledocholithiasis.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
See all related articles

Minilaparoscopic appendectomy using 2-mm instruments shows comparable outcomes to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. However, retrocecal appendix and older patient age are risk factors for conversion in this minimally invasive approach.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy utilizes larger instruments (5- and 10-mm).
  • The feasibility of using smaller 2-mm instruments for appendicitis treatment is under investigation.
  • Identifying limitations for smaller instrument use is crucial for surgical advancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in appendicitis treatment.
  • To identify risk factors associated with the limited use of 2-mm instruments.
  • To compare perioperative outcomes of minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Minilaparoscopic appendectomy (2-mm instruments) was performed on 26 patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A control group of 32 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (5- and 10-mm instruments).
  • Statistical analysis included Student t test and Fisher exact test (P < 0.05).

    • Main Results:

    • Mean operative time was shorter for minilaparoscopic appendectomy (69.5 min) compared to conventional (85.5 min) (P = 0.02).
    • Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 50% of patients; conversions were associated with retrocecal appendix and older age (P = 0.05).
    • No significant differences in postoperative length of stay or complication rates were observed between groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Minilaparoscopic appendectomy with 2-mm instruments offers comparable perioperative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
    • Retrocecal appendicitis and increasing patient age are significant risk factors limiting the use of 2-mm instrumentation.
    • Further research may optimize the application of 2-mm instruments in specific appendicitis cases.