Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tissue matrices for soft tissue and mucosal augmentation and replacement.

Brent B Ward1, Stephen E Feinberg, Craig D Friedman

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48100-0018, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|February 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on the Management of the Clinically Negative Neck (cN0) in cT1N0 and cT2N0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Actigraphy-based differences in sleep in those receiving opioid versus non-opioid therapy postsurgical removal of impacted third molars: a pilot study from the opioid analgesic reduction study (OARS).

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Analgesic Differences in Males and Females After Third Molar Surgery: A Subgroup Analysis of the OARS Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Fellowship Training and Expanded Scope as a Practice Model.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2025
Same author

Association Between Type of Residency Interview, Virtual Versus In-Person, and Distance From Applicants' Dental School to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Program Matched: Report From the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Committee on Education and Training.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2025
Same author

Nonopioid vs opioid analgesics after impacted third-molar extractions: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study randomized clinical trial.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2025

Facial plastic surgery requires understanding various tissue replacement materials. Surgeons need current knowledge of options, risks, and benefits to guide patient decisions effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Facial plastic surgery often necessitates soft tissue and mucosal surface replacement or augmentation.
  • Advancements in materials and surgical techniques are frequent in this field.
  • Keeping abreast of these developments is crucial for surgeons to offer optimal patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the guiding concepts for material selection in facial soft tissue and mucosal reconstruction.
  • To discuss a range of available materials, including established, novel, and investigational options.
  • To emphasize the importance of understanding material risks and benefits for informed patient decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current and emerging materials for facial reconstruction.
  • Analysis of decision-making concepts in material selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the risks and benefits associated with various biomaterials.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive overview of historical, current, and investigational materials used in facial plastic surgery.
    • Identification of key factors influencing the choice of materials for soft tissue and mucosal replacement.
    • Emphasis on the surgeon's role in communicating material properties to patients.

    Conclusions:

    • Informed material selection is vital for successful facial soft tissue and mucosal augmentation.
    • Continuous learning regarding new biomaterials enhances surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    • The ongoing development of novel materials promises further improvements in reconstructive possibilities.