Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prevention, community services and Proposition 36.

F D Wittman1

  • 1Community Prevention Planning Program, Institute for the Study of Social Change at UC Berkeley, California, USA.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
|February 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Community services and prevention policies offer effective alternatives to incarceration for Prop 36 and court diversion programs. These strategies aim to reduce recidivism and improve outcomes for participants.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Planning and programming server intervention initiatives for fraternities and sororities: Experiences at a large university.

The journal of primary prevention·2013
Same author

Therapeutic jurisprudence: a multidisciplinary conference.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2002
Same author

Cutting services to chronic inebriates represents no paradox of accessibility: a response to Kaufman and Walfish.

The International journal of the addictions·1986
Same author

Task force report: sociophysical settings and mental health: opportunities for mental health services planning.

Community mental health journal·1980

Area of Science:

  • Criminal Justice
  • Public Health
  • Social Policy

Background:

  • Court diversion programs, such as California's Proposition 36, aim to provide alternatives to incarceration.
  • There is a growing need for evidence-based community services and prevention policies within these programs.
  • Integrating diverse support systems is crucial for successful rehabilitation and reducing recidivism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize presentations from the Therapeutic Jurisprudence conference's Prevention Panel.
  • To identify community services and prevention policies applicable to Prop 36 and other court diversion programs.
  • To propose the implementation of these services as alternatives to incarceration.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of presentations from a conference panel.
  • Analysis of existing community services and prevention policies.
  • Conceptual framework development for integrating services into diversion programs.

Main Results:

  • Several community services and prevention policies were identified as potentially effective.
  • These services can be integrated into Prop 36 and other court diversion programs.
  • The presented strategies offer viable alternatives to traditional incarceration.

Conclusions:

  • Community-based services and prevention policies are valuable components of court diversion.
  • Successful implementation requires careful planning and integration with existing program structures.
  • Adopting these alternatives can lead to improved outcomes for individuals and communities.

Related Experiment Videos