Related Experiment Videos
Finding appropriate clinical trials: evaluating encoded eligibility criteria with incomplete data
1Decision Systems Group, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|February 5, 2002
Summary
This study created a system to automate clinical trial eligibility screening for breast cancer, showing feasibility for patient and physician use in trial selection.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Informatics
- Clinical Trial Management
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Automating the evaluation of clinical trial eligibility criteria is crucial for efficient patient recruitment.
- Breast cancer clinical trials present complex eligibility requirements that necessitate systematic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a system for automating the assessment of patient eligibility for breast cancer clinical trials.
- To enhance the process of matching patients with suitable clinical research protocols.
Main Methods:
- Developed a data model for breast cancer trial eligibility criteria, encoding them using standard vocabularies.
- Utilized Bayesian networks to manage missing patient data and calculate eligibility probabilities.
- Ranked clinical trial protocols based on the system's calculated probability of patient eligibility.
Main Results:
- The system demonstrated good agreement (kappa 0.86) with an independent physician for protocol selection.
- However, agreement was poor (kappa 0.24) for protocol ranking, indicating areas for improvement.
- The approach proved feasible in assisting with the initial selection of appropriate trials.
Conclusions:
- The automated system for evaluating clinical trial eligibility criteria is a feasible approach.
- This technology has the potential to significantly assist both physicians and patients in identifying suitable clinical trials.
- Further refinement is needed, particularly in the protocol ranking component, to maximize utility.