Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.8K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

872
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
872
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

2.5K
Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
2.5K
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

2.0K
Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
2.0K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

1.1K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.1K
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

300
Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...
300

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

Patterns of care in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in China: a real-world physician survey study.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

How to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE: an evidence-based decision-analytical approach.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Theory of clinical therapeutic progress: reconciling equipoise with fat-tailed (skewed) outcomes.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same journal

Barriers and facilitators to implementing discharge preparation services for older adults with multimorbidity: a qualitative study guided by the updated CFIR.

BMC health services research·2026
Same journal

Coverage, pricing, and reimbursement of telemedicine: a qualitative study among implementers of the Akoma Pa mHealth-based telemedicine intervention in Ghana.

BMC health services research·2026
Same journal

Hospital system resilience in the face of armed conflicts; a cross sectional study from two regions in Lebanon.

BMC health services research·2026
Same journal

Career choice, training satisfaction, and retention intentions among healthcare apprentices: a cross-sectional study in rural Germany.

BMC health services research·2026
Same journal

Assessment of the patient safety culture and the influencing factors among medical staff in a non-public tertiary general hospital in China.

BMC health services research·2026
Same journal

A descriptive analysis of hospital-based palliative care services: a case study from Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.

BMC health services research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 17, 2011

26.2K

Quality and methods of developing practice guidelines.

Hugh Cruse1, Magdalena Winiarek, Jan Marshburn

  • 1H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research institute, the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. crusehh@moffitt.usf.edu <crusehh@moffitt.usf.edu>

BMC Health Services Research
|February 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evidence-based (EB) guidelines demonstrate superior quality compared to consensus-based (CB) guidelines. Utilizing high-quality evidence improves agreement in clinical recommendations, enhancing guideline reliability.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 17, 2011

26.2K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical guideline development
  • Health services research
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • The comparative quality and recommendations of evidence-based (EB) versus consensus-based (CB) clinical guidelines remain unclear.
  • Breast cancer guidelines were selected as a case study to investigate these differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the quality of breast cancer guidelines developed using different methodologies (EB, CB, and CB-EB).
  • To assess the impact of evidence quality on guideline recommendations and inter-guideline agreement.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search identified five guideline quality assessment instruments.
  • Eight breast cancer guidelines were categorized as EB, CB-EB, or CB.
  • Guidelines were evaluated using multiple instruments, assessing agreement on 14 decision points and the quality of supporting evidence.
  • Regression analysis examined the relationship between high-quality evidence percentage and overall guideline quality.

Main Results:

  • EB guidelines generally scored higher in quality than CB guidelines, with CB-EB guidelines falling in between.
  • No significant disagreement in recommendations was found across guideline types, though EB guidelines showed better agreement with a benchmark.
  • Higher quality evidence strongly correlated with greater agreement among guideline recommendations, explaining up to 94% of quality score variations.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence-based guidelines exhibit superior quality compared to consensus-based and hybrid CB-EB approaches.
  • The explicit use of high-quality evidence enhances agreement among clinical recommendations.
  • Despite methodological differences, substantial disagreement in recommendations among breast cancer guidelines was not observed.