Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

307
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
307
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

610
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
610
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

674
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
674
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the transition from psoriasis to psoriatic arthritis: the role of targeted therapy.

EULAR rheumatology open·2026
Same author

Body mass index and achievement of minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis across different classes of advanced therapy.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Variable Selection for Illness-Death Processes Under Dual Observation Schemes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Two-phase designs for biomarker studies when disease processes are under intermittent observation.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Repair of radiographic joint damage in psoriatic arthritis: a cohort study.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

An Overview and Recent Developments in the Analysis of Multistate Processes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Selection effects in randomized trials with count data.

Richard J Cook1, Wei Wei

  • 1Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Canada. rjcookj@uwaterloo.ca

Statistics in Medicine
|February 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Selection criteria in clinical trials can bias count data analysis. This study examines bias and efficiency for count and recurrent event data, offering insights for accurate clinical trial interpretation.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

44.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Clinical trials often use baseline measurements as selection criteria to define study populations.
  • While effects on normally distributed data are understood, selection criteria's impact on count or recurrent event data is less clear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the bias and relative efficiency of common statistical analysis methods for count data when selection criteria are present.
  • To assess the consequences of ignoring the selection mechanism in the analysis of clinical trial data.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs asymptotic theory for misspecified models.
  • Simulation studies are used to evaluate analytical methods.
  • Real-world data from an epilepsy trial and a myocardial ischaemia study are utilized for illustration.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring selection criteria can introduce bias and affect the efficiency of analyses for count data.
  • The impact of selection criteria varies depending on the specific analysis method and data characteristics.
  • Illustrative examples demonstrate significant effects when the selection mechanism is not accounted for.

Conclusions:

  • Careful consideration of selection criteria is crucial for the valid analysis of count and recurrent event data in clinical trials.
  • Statistical methods must account for selection mechanisms to avoid biased results and ensure accurate interpretation of trial outcomes.
  • The findings have implications for designing and analyzing studies involving count or recurrent event outcomes.