Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Bite mark analysis. Part 2. A selection of Dutch cases].

E A van Dijk1

  • 1Delta Psychiatrisch Ziekenhuis, Albrandswaardsedijk 74, 3172 AA Portugaal.

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study details three bite mark analyses, examining evidence from deceased individuals, living persons, and food items. These cases highlight the application and challenges of bite mark comparison in forensic science.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous determination of levomepromazine, midazolam and their major metabolites in human plasma by reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences·2003
Same author

Effect of heat treatment of potentially infected blood samples on therapeutic drug monitoring of selected drugs.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·1993
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Odontology
  • Bite Mark Analysis
  • Pattern Evidence

Background:

  • Bite mark analysis is a forensic discipline used to identify or exclude individuals based on dental characteristics.
  • The interpretation of bite marks can be complex due to factors like tissue distortion and individual dental variations.

Observation:

  • The author presents three distinct case studies involving bite mark evidence.
  • Case 1: Bite mark on deceased individual.
  • Case 2: Bite mark on living victim.
  • Case 3: Bite mark on food item.

Findings:

  • Each case presented unique challenges and considerations for bite mark comparison.
  • The variability of substrates (skin, bone, food) impacts the clarity and interpretability of bite mark evidence.

Implications:

  • This work underscores the importance of meticulous documentation and expert interpretation in bite mark analysis.
  • The findings contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding the scientific validity and application of bite mark evidence in legal proceedings.

Related Experiment Videos