Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carols in the wind.

J E Marley1, P Searle, N L Chamberlain

  • 1Department of General Practice, University of Adelaide, SA. john.marley@adelaide.edu.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|February 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species.

Heredity·2011
Same author

Bioaccessible arsenic in the home environment in southwest England.

The Science of the total environment·2006
Same author

Privacy considerations in the context of an Australian observational database.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2002
Same author

Positive impact of rural academic family practices on rural medical recruitment and retention in South Australia.

The Australian journal of rural health·2001
Same author

A randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over.

The Medical journal of Australia·2001
Same author

Virus-directed, enzyme prodrug therapy with nitroimidazole reductase: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of its prodrug, CB1954.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2001
Same journal

Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Striving for Racial Equity in Oral Cancer Research: A Case Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Self-Poisoning With Prazosin and Its Off-Label Use in Australia, 2014-2024: Analysis of NSW Poisons Information Centre Data.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Four Urgent Actions for the Rights to Culturally Safe Breastfeeding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Babies to Breastfeed in Neonatal Intensive Care Environments.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

Digital organs are as effective as pipe organs in improving mood and reducing negative emotions. This study found no significant differences in the mood-altering effects of either instrument.

Area of Science:

  • Music Psychology
  • Acoustic Musicology
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Music's impact on mood is well-documented.
  • Pipe organs have a long history in religious and cultural settings.
  • The sonic differences between pipe and digital organs may influence emotional responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the mood and emotional effects of music played on traditional pipe organs versus modern digital (pipeless) organs.
  • To investigate whether the type of organ used affects beneficial mood changes.
  • To assess the efficacy of digital organs in emotional regulation.

Main Methods:

  • A two-organ crossover study design was employed.
  • Participants included 43 non-musician volunteers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mood and emotional states were measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS).

    • Main Results:

    • Both pipe and digital organs significantly reduced tension-anxiety, depression-rejection, anger-hostility, and fatigue.
    • No significant changes were observed in vigour or confusion-bewilderment.
    • There were no statistically significant differences in the mood-altering effects between the two types of organs.

    Conclusions:

    • Pipeless (digital) organs are equally effective as pipe organs in inducing positive mood changes.
    • The findings suggest digital organs can be a viable alternative for therapeutic or mood-enhancing musical experiences.
    • The study supports the use of digital organs for their psychological benefits, comparable to traditional pipe organs.