Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?

James Fanning1, Jay Padratzik

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Ohio, Richard D. Ruppert Health Center, Toledo, OH 43614-5809, USA.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|February 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health Literacy and Cultural Sensitivity in Spanish Online Breast Reduction Resources.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same author

The Quality of Information About Body Dysmorphia on TikTok.

Annals of plastic surgery·2025
Same author

A Comprehensive Analysis on the Readability of Rhinoplasty-Based Web Content for Patients.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Changes on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging following lymphatic surgery for upper extremity secondary lymphedema.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2024
Same author

Treatment of mild-to-moderate facial cutaneous aging using a combination peel containing 6% trichloroacetic acid and 12% lactic acid.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2023
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 hijacks host cell genome instability pathways.

Research square·2022

Cold knife conization removes significantly more tissue than loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP). Cold knife cone specimens were 50% longer and 100% heavier, indicating greater tissue removal in cervical procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Surgical Pathology
  • Cervical Pathology

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening and treatment often involve excisional procedures.
  • Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold knife conization are common methods for removing cervical tissue.
  • Understanding the volume of tissue removed is crucial for accurate pathological assessment and patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively compare the amount of tissue removed by LEEP versus cold knife conization.
  • To quantify differences in specimen diameter, length, and weight between the two procedures.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 40 consecutive LEEP and cold knife conization specimens.
  • Specimens were measured (diameter, length) and weighed by a single pathology technician.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical comparison of specimen metrics using Student's t test.

    • Main Results:

    • Cold knife cone specimens showed a trend towards larger diameter (2.6 cm vs. 2.2 cm, P = .07).
    • Cold knife cone specimens were significantly longer (1.5 cm vs. 1.0 cm, P = .001) and heavier (4.4 g vs. 2.0 g, P = .001) than LEEP specimens.
    • On average, cold knife conization yielded specimens 50% longer and 100% heavier than LEEP.

    Conclusions:

    • Cold knife conization results in a significantly greater volume of excised cervical tissue compared to LEEP.
    • These findings have implications for histopathological evaluation and understanding the extent of tissue removal in cervical procedures.
    • The quantitative differences highlight the need to consider the method of excision when interpreting pathology reports.