Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mental models and logical reasoning problems in the GRE.

Y Yang1, P N Johnson-Laird

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590, USA. yangyri@rpi.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|February 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Recursion in programs, thought, and language.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same author

Reasoning about properties: A computational theory.

Psychological review·2021
Same author

The probability of conditionals: A review.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

This study analyzes Graduate Record Examination logical reasoning problems using mental model theory. Four experiments reveal task nature, foil selection, and conclusion type significantly impact problem difficulty for human reasoners.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Educational Assessment

Background:

  • Logical reasoning problems on standardized tests like the GRE are complex.
  • Existing AI struggles with these demanding reasoning tasks.
  • Mental model theory offers a framework for understanding human reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze Graduate Record Examination (GRE) logical reasoning problems.
  • To apply mental model theory to understand reasoning difficulties.
  • To identify factors influencing problem complexity and inform new problem design.

Main Methods:

  • Applied mental model theory to analyze GRE logical reasoning problems.
  • Conducted four experiments to test theoretical predictions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigated the impact of logical task nature, foil characteristics, and conclusion types.
  • Main Results:

    • Confirmed three primary causes of difficulty in logical reasoning problems.
    • Experiment 1: Nature of the logical task.
    • Experiment 2: Characteristics of the foil options.
    • Experiments 3 & 4: Nature of the conclusions presented.

    Conclusions:

    • The mental model theory successfully predicts and explains difficulties in GRE logical reasoning.
    • Identified key factors (task, foils, conclusions) influencing problem difficulty.
    • Findings can guide the development of more effective reasoning assessment tools.