Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biotechnology and human rights.

B Feuillet-Le Mintier1

  • 1Centre de Recherche Juridique de l'Ouest (IODE, UMR CNRS n(o) 6050), Faculté de Droit et de Science Politique, Rennes, France. brigitte.le-mintier@univ-rennes1.fr

Cellular and Molecular Biology (Noisy-Le-Grand, France)
|February 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Biotechnology advances human progress but poses risks, particularly regarding human species modification. Legal frameworks are essential to protect fundamental human rights from potential harm in this rapidly evolving field.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Reflections on the Perruche judgment].

Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie·2002
Same author

Ethics education in medical schools: the role of jurists.

Medicine and law·2001
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology and Bioethics
  • Human Rights Law

Background:

  • Biotechnology offers significant advancements for humanity.
  • The application of biotechnology to living organisms, especially humans, presents unique ethical challenges and potential dangers.
  • Economic interests in biotechnology are substantial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the intersection of biotechnology and human rights.
  • To examine the risks associated with human species modification through biotechnological advancements.
  • To assert the necessity of legal frameworks to safeguard fundamental human rights.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of biotechnological applications.
  • Legal review of existing rights frameworks.
  • Discussion of potential future scenarios in human modification.

Main Results:

  • Biotechnology's dual potential for progress and harm is highlighted.
  • The risk of altering the human species necessitates careful consideration.
  • Existing legal systems must adapt to address these new challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Legal and ethical guidelines are crucial to manage biotechnological advancements.
  • Protecting fundamental human rights is paramount in the face of human modification.
  • The significant economic stakes underscore the urgency of establishing robust regulatory measures.

Related Experiment Videos