Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma
Published on: July 28, 2020
Infectious complications resulting from use of hemostatic puncture closure devices
T P Smith1, C P Cruz, M M Moursi
1Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Insights
Hemostatic puncture closure devices, like Perclose, offer similar bleeding control to manual compression after femoral artery catheterization. However, these devices are linked to a higher incidence of infectious groin complications requiring surgical intervention.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Radiology
Background:
- Increasing femoral access site complications necessitate improved closure techniques.
- Hemostatic puncture closure devices were developed to manage hemorrhage.
- Groin complications are a concern in minimally invasive procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare infectious groin complications between Perclose devices and manual compression.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hemostatic closure devices.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of cardiac catheterizations.
- Analysis of infectious groin complications associated with Perclose Prostar and Techstar devices.
- Comparison with manual compression group.
Main Results:
- Infectious groin complications were significantly higher in the Perclose group versus manual compression.
- Five patients experienced infections (3 arterial, 2 soft tissue), requiring operative intervention.
- No significant difference in hemorrhagic complications between device and manual compression groups.
Conclusions:
- Perclose devices achieve hemostasis comparable to manual compression post-femoral artery catheterization.
- Infectious groin complications are more frequent with Perclose devices.
- Careful patient selection and monitoring are crucial when using these devices.
Background:
Femoral access site complications have increased as the fields of invasive cardiology, radiology, and endovascular surgery have emerged. In order to address one of these complications, hemorrhage, the hemostatic puncture closure devices were developed.
Methods:
Retrospective review of cardiac catheterizations performed at a single institution to investigate infectious groin complications related to use of the Perclose Prostar and Techstar devices.
Results:
Infectious groin complications were significantly higher in the Perclose group as compared with manual compression. Three patients had clinical and laboratory evidence of arterial infection whereas 2 had soft tissue infections. All 5 required operative intervention ranging from incision and drainage to arterial reconstruction. Hemorrhagic complications were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusions:
The Perclose devices provide hemostasis after femoral artery catheterization similar to manual compression. However, infectious groin complications appear to be more common with these devices.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Hemostasis
The three phases of hemostasis involve many clotting factors present in plasma and several substances released by platelets and injured tissue cells. It is a fast, localized, and...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Healing II: Complications
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology

