Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
Published on: December 15, 2010
Will claims workers dislike a computerized fraud detector?
1University of California, Santa Barbara, USA.
Abstract:
The computerized fraud detector (CFRD) assigns suspicion scores to questionable automobile insurance claims. Evaluators pilot tested this algorithm in three offices, comparing its effects with three matched offices. Observers uncovered that in two target offices and one comparison office, Millennium 2000 (M2K) also was being installed. The study design thus became as follows: Two offices had two interventions, one office had CFRD but not M2K, another office had M2K but not CFRD, and two offices had neither. Hierarchical linear models document that offices with both new computer systems will have the most unfavorable employee attitudes toward computerized fraud detection, followed by offices with only one new system. Employees with jobs of higher rank and employees not receptive to innovation will dislike computerized fraud detection. Implementation of one computer system, CFRD or M2K, may have minor negative fixed effects on employee attitudes, but their effects on the between-office variance are inconsequential.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Stereotype Content Model
Confirmation Biases
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...