Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics and science: educating the public.

R Brownhill1, L Merricks

  • 1School of Educational Studies, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU7 5XH, UK. r.brownhill@surrey.ac.uk

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This article examines the 20th-century debate on scientific ethics and organization, focusing on the responsibilities of scientists, truth, and societal benefit. Key figures like Soddy, Polanyi, and Bernal shaped discussions on science

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety within the community: legislation, change and education.

Accident and emergency nursingยท1996
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • * History and Philosophy of Science
  • * Sociology of Science

Background:

  • * Exploration of a pivotal public debate in the early 20th century concerning the ethical responsibilities and organizational structures of science.
  • * The enduring repercussions of this debate on contemporary scientific practices and societal integration.

Observation:

  • * Analysis of key scientific figures' perspectives: Frederick Soddy (Nobel Laureate) on scientist responsibility for research applications.
  • * Michael Polanyi's emphasis on scientific obligation to truth and the integral role of morality in scientific organization.
  • * J.D. Bernal's utilitarian viewpoint, advocating for science's conscious development for societal good.

Findings:

  • * The debate centered on the tension between scientific autonomy, ethical accountability, and the societal utility of research.
  • * Contrasting views highlight the multifaceted nature of scientific responsibility and the organization of scientific endeavors.
  • * Historical perspectives reveal foundational arguments influencing current science policy and ethics.

Implications:

  • * Understanding these historical debates is crucial for navigating contemporary ethical challenges in science.
  • * The findings inform discussions on science governance, funding, and the societal role of scientific research.
  • * Provides a historical framework for evaluating the ethical implications of scientific advancement and application.

Related Experiment Videos