Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preconception gender selection.

J A Robertson1

  • 1School of Law, University of Texas at Austin.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|February 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remarks on Iritis.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Remarks on Amaurosis, with Cases.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Sleep disturbance in patients taking opioid medication for chronic back pain.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Renewal of Menstruation and Subsequent Pregnancy after Removal of Both Ovaries.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Physicians rally against threat of a nuclear epidemic.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Chalk river nuclear laboratories.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010

Preconception gender selection using sperm sorting is becoming safer and more effective. While raising ethical concerns, its use for family balancing or selecting a firstborn

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Science
  • Bioethics
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Advancements in flow cytometry enable sperm sorting based on X and Y chromosomes.
  • Preconception gender selection is a growing area of interest for prospective parents.
  • Societal implications of widespread gender selection require careful ethical consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ethical, legal, and social issues surrounding preconception gender selection.
  • To evaluate the acceptability of using sperm sorting for reproductive choices.
  • To explore the impact on offspring, sex ratios, and gender equality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical frameworks and legal precedents.
  • Review of scientific literature on sperm sorting technologies.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of societal impacts and potential consequences.

    • Main Results:

    • Flow cytometric sperm separation offers a potentially safe and effective method for gender selection.
    • Ethical debates involve parental autonomy versus societal concerns.
    • Potential for sex ratio imbalances and exacerbation of sexism exists.

    Conclusions:

    • Gender selection for increasing family gender diversity may be ethically acceptable.
    • Selecting the gender of a firstborn child could also be ethically permissible in certain contexts.
    • Careful regulation and societal dialogue are crucial for responsible implementation.