Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using prognostic models in clinical infertility.

Ben W. J. Mol1, Madelon van Wely, Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Human Fertility (Cambridge, England)
|February 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ovarian reserve markers in World Health Organization type 1 anovulatory disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Reducing pain and anxiety with virtual reality in (outpatient) gynecological procedures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

AJOG global reports·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of time-lapse monitoring with or without the use of embryo selection software compared to routine incubation and selection.

Human reproduction open·2026
Same author

Reproductive outcomes after fertility preservation using tamoxifen or letrozole in women with breast cancer: a long-term follow-up.

F&S reports·2026
Same author

Making narrative review abstracts count.

Human reproduction update·2026
Same author

Less Is More: Optimized pharmacotherapy with improved coNtinuity of CarE in hospitaLized oLder peOple (LIMONCELLO): study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BMC geriatrics·2025

For couples trying to conceive, the chance of spontaneous pregnancy remains higher than with assisted conception. Current prognostic models for spontaneous conception are acceptable, but IVF prediction models require improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Prognostics

Background:

  • Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are increasingly utilized for infertility, yet spontaneous conception remains a significant possibility for many couples.
  • Evaluating the likelihood of unassisted pregnancy is crucial for informed decision-making regarding fertility treatments.
  • Prognostic models offer a quantitative approach to predict conception probabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess the theoretical underpinnings of prognostic modeling in reproductive medicine.
  • To evaluate the clinical utility and performance of existing prognostic models for both spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies.
  • To determine if current models are sufficiently validated for practical application in patient care.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review and theoretical discussion of prognostic modeling principles in the context of fertility.
  • Systematic assessment of the internal and external validation of published prognostic models for spontaneous conception.
  • Analysis of the validation performance of models predicting pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization.

Main Results:

  • Prognostic models for spontaneous conception demonstrate acceptable performance upon internal and external validation.
  • Existing models for predicting in vitro fertilization (IVF) success show disappointing performance in external validation studies.
  • Significant discrepancies exist in the validation robustness between models predicting spontaneous versus treatment-dependent conception.

Conclusions:

  • While models for predicting spontaneous pregnancy are promising for clinical use, further validation is needed.
  • Current prognostic models for IVF outcomes are not yet sufficiently reliable for widespread clinical implementation.
  • Refinement and rigorous external validation of IVF prognostic models are essential to improve their clinical applicability and patient counseling.